Body schema and body image—Pros and cons
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Body schema and body image—Pros and cons
There seems to benodimensionof bodily awareness that cannot bedisrupted. To account for such variety, there is a growing consensus that there are at least two distinct types of body representation that can be impaired, the body schema and the body image. However, the definition of these notions is often unclear. The notion of body image has attracted most controversy because of its lack of unif...
متن کاملBody schema and body image--pros and cons.
There seems to be no dimension of bodily awareness that cannot be disrupted. To account for such variety, there is a growing consensus that there are at least two distinct types of body representation that can be impaired, the body schema and the body image. However, the definition of these notions is often unclear. The notion of body image has attracted most controversy because of its lack of ...
متن کاملRobot imitation : Body schema and body percept
There are two functional elements used by humans to understand and perform actions. These elements are: the body schema and the body percept. The first one is a representation of the body that contains information of the body’s capabilities. The second one is a snapshot of the body and its relation with the environment at a given instant. These elements interact in order to generate, among othe...
متن کاملBody schema and body awareness of amputees.
AIM The phantom phenomenon is a well-known example of the difference between body awareness and body schema. The present study is aimed at showing how body changes and prosthesis use are reflected in body schema and body awareness-the latter relating to the image that various amputees have of their bodies. SUBJECT AND METHODS (i) Examining the configuration of body schema: A trial examining t...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Neuropsychologia
سال: 2010
ISSN: 0028-3932
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.022